Should nuclear power be revived in California and the United States Research Paper

Should thermonuclear antecedent be revived in California and the United States - Research Paper ExampleThe aftermath of using fossil fuel as a source of energy has recently revived the interest of incorporating nuclear power as a major source of energy. The need of reviving the hire of nuclear power has further being change by the ever-increasing population, thus increasing the lead of energy. Reliable operations and safety are the main requirements that inject about to the approval of nuclear energy as a source of power generation (Rosen and Glasser, 1992, p. 308).Importance of nuclear powerDevelopment imperativeOn attaining a wealth of information from the US senate, senator Domenici indicated that human discipline is the creation of a surrounding where individuals can establish their maximum potential, as humans are considered the accepted wealth of the world indeed, human development supersedes economic growth. The fact remains that we need energy to non only drive our industries, but also support our current trends of living. Lack of electricity has been identified as one of the perpetrators of poverty. In 1999, the United States was noted to consume approximately 25 percent of the worlds energy. Nevertheless, high consumption of electricity indicates the ever-changing lifestyle in United States growing population. Nuclear power generation as a way of diversifying the sources of electricity generation can not only cease up fossil fuel, but also ensure the uses have no other substitutes. The result of use of nuclear power is a cleaner environment, creation of more job opportunities and maximum use of on hand(predicate) raw material. . gibe to Sir Ingham, based on rational discourse, nuclear power should be viewed based as the foundation of mans sustainable power that has no offence to the surrounding. environment (Domenici, Lyons and Steyn, 2004, p. 182, 183 & 184). Substitute for infixed gas and oil imports. Increase in population brings abou t high demand of energy. This high demand of energy hence forces the country to import energy, which could lead to political instability and lack of cost control. According to Domenici, Lyons and Steyn (2004), reliance of imported energy has been predicted to rise from 50 percent to 70 percent in the decades to come within the European countries. Heavy reliance of imported energy may have negative globose impact and hence United States should have an equilibrium energy policy that incorporates healthy reliance on nuclear power in order to suppress the ever-increasing competition of fossil fuel egress in the decades to come. America depart encounter stiff competition from fast developing countries and the European Union countries for supply of imported energy and hence the best option will be for the country to incorporate the nuclear energy option and attain the diversification of electricity. The heavy reliance of natural gas and oil imports will not only lead the United States to a dangerous path but also result the nation to the situation it was fifty years ago regarding foreign oil imports. According to the research undertaken by EIA, 39 percent of US energy is bound to be imported as indicated statistically in 2002 when 29 percent of the country